Family:
Tags:
Document Type:
Task Name Family Description Document Type Samples Submissions
abercrombie LegalBench Determine the Abercrombie classification for a mark/product pair. legal question 100 19
canada_tax_court_outcomes LegalBench Classify whether an excerpt from a Canada Tax Court decision includes the outcome of the appeal, and if so, specify whether the appeal was allowed or dismissed. judicial text 250 7
citation_prediction_classification LegalBench Determine if a case citation is supportive of a given legal statement. judicial text 110 7
citation_prediction_open LegalBench Given a legal statement, predict the name of the case which best supports the statement. judicial text 55 7
consumer_contracts_qa LegalBench Answer yes/no questions on the rights and obligations created by clauses in terms of services agreements. contract clause 400 7
contract_nli_Notice on compelled disclosure LegalBench Identify if the clause provides that the Receiving Party shall notify Disclosing Party in case Receiving Party is required by law, regulation or judicial process to disclose any Confidential Information. contract clause 150 7
contract_nli_Permissible acquirement of similar information LegalBench Identify if the clause provides that the Receiving Party may acquire information similar to Confidential Information from a third party. contract clause 186 7
contract_nli_confidentiality_of_agreement LegalBench Identify if the clause provides that the Receiving Party shall not disclose the fact that Agreement was agreed or negotiated. contract clause 90 7
contract_nli_explicit_identification LegalBench Determine whether a clause from an NDA specifies that all Confidential Information shall be expressly identified by the Disclosing Party. contract clause 117 7
contract_nli_inclusion_of_verbally_conveyed_information LegalBench Identify if the clause provides that Confidential Information may include verbally conveyed information. contract clause 147 7
contract_nli_limited_use LegalBench Determine whether a clause from a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) restricts the Receiving Party's use of Confidential Information to the purposes stated in the Agreement. contract clause 216 7
contract_nli_no_licensing LegalBench Determine whether a clause from a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) grants the Receiving Party any rights to Confidential Information. contract clause 170 7
contract_nli_permissible_copy LegalBench Determine whether a clause from an NDA allows the Receiving Party to create a copy of Confidential Information under certain circumstances. contract clause 95 7
contract_nli_permissible_development_of_similar_information LegalBench Identify if the clause provides that the Receiving Party may independently develop information similar to Confidential Information. contract clause 144 7
contract_nli_permissible_post-agreement_possession LegalBench Determine if a clause from an NDA allows the Receiving Party to retain some Confidential Information after its return or destruction. contract clause 119 7
contract_nli_return_of_confidential_information LegalBench Identify if the clause provides that the Receiving Party shall destroy or return some Confidential Information upon the termination of Agreement. contract clause 74 7
contract_nli_sharing_with_employees LegalBench Determine whether a clause from an NDA allows the Receiving Party to share Confidential Information with its employees. contract clause 178 7
contract_nli_sharing_with_third-parties LegalBench Identify if the clause provides that the Receiving Party may share some Confidential Information with some third-parties (including consultants, agents and professional advisors). contract clause 188 7
contract_nli_survival_of_obligations LegalBench Identify if the clause provides that some obligations of Agreement may survive termination of Agreement. contract clause 165 7
contract_qa LegalBench The LLM must determine if language from a contract contains a particular type of content by answering yes/no questions. contract clause 88 7
corporate_lobbying LegalBench The Corporate Lobbying task requires an LLM to determine whether a proposed Congressional bill may be relevant to a company based on a company’s self-description in its SEC 10K filing. corporate disclosure 500 7
cuad_affiliate_license-licensee LegalBench Classify if a clause describes a license grant to a licensee (incl. sublicensor) and the affiliates of such licensee/sublicensor. contract clause 204 7
cuad_affiliate_license-licensor LegalBench Classify if the clause describes a license grant by affiliates of the licensor or that includes intellectual property of affiliates of the licensor. contract clause 94 7
cuad_anti-assignment LegalBench Classify if the clause requires consent or notice of a party if the contract is assigned to a third party. contract clause 1178 7
cuad_audit_rights LegalBench Classify if the clause gives a party the right to audit the books, records, or physical locations of the counterparty to ensure compliance with the contract. contract clause 1222 7
cuad_cap_on_liability LegalBench Classify if the clause specifies a cap on liability upon the breach of a party’s obligation. contract clause 1252 7
cuad_change_of_control LegalBench Classify if the clause gives one party the right to terminate or if consent or notice is required of the counterparty in the event of a change of control. contract clause 422 7
cuad_competitive_restriction_exception LegalBench Classify if the clause mentions exceptions or carveouts to Non-Compete, Exclusivity and No-Solicit of Customers. contract clause 226 7
cuad_covenant_not_to_sue LegalBench Classify if the clause specifies that a party is restricted from contesting the validity of the counterparty’s ownership of intellectual property or otherwise bringing a claim against the counterparty for matters unrelated to the contract. contract clause 314 7
cuad_effective_date LegalBench Classify if the clause specifies the date upon which the agreement becomes effective. contract clause 242 7
cuad_exclusivity LegalBench Classify if the clause specifies exclusive dealing commitment with the counterparty. contract clause 768 7
cuad_expiration_date LegalBench Classify if the clause specifies the date upon which the initial term expires. contract clause 882 7
cuad_governing_law LegalBench Classify if the clause specifies which state/country's law governs the contract. contract clause 882 7
cuad_insurance LegalBench Classify if a clause creates a requirement for insurance that must be maintained by one party for the benefit of the counterparty. contract clause 1036 7
cuad_ip_ownership_assignment LegalBench The LLM must classify whether a contractual clause specifies that intellectual property created by one party becomes the property of the counterparty. contract clause 582 7
cuad_irrevocable_or_perpetual_license LegalBench Classify if the clause specifies a license grant that is irrevocable or perpetual. contract clause 286 7
cuad_joint_ip_ownership LegalBench Classify if the clause provides for joint or shared ownership of intellectual property between the parties to the contract. contract clause 198 7
cuad_license_grant LegalBench Classify if the clause contains a license granted by one party to its counterparty. contract clause 1402 7
cuad_liquidated_damages LegalBench Classify if the clause awards either party liquidated damages for breach or a fee upon the termination of a contract (termination fee). contract clause 226 7
cuad_minimum_commitment LegalBench Classify if the clause specifies a minimum order size or minimum amount or units per time period that one party must buy from the counterparty. contract clause 778 7
cuad_most_favored_nation LegalBench The model must determine if a contractual clause qualifies as a 'Most Favored Nation' clause based on specified criteria. contract clause 70 7
cuad_no-solicit_of_customers LegalBench Classify if the clause restricts a party from contracting or soliciting customers or partners of the counterparty, whether during the contract or after the contract ends (or both). contract clause 90 7
cuad_no-solicit_of_employees LegalBench Classify if the clause restricts a party’s soliciting or hiring employees and/or contractors from the counterparty, whether during the contract or after the contract ends (or both). contract clause 148 7
cuad_non-compete LegalBench Classify if the clause restricts the ability of a party to compete with the counterparty or operate in a certain geography or business or technology sector. contract clause 448 7
cuad_non-disparagement LegalBench Classify if the clause requires a party not to disparage the counterparty. contract clause 106 7
cuad_non-transferable_license LegalBench Classify if the clause limits the ability of a party to transfer the license being granted to a third party. contract clause 548 7
cuad_notice_period_to_terminate_renewal LegalBench Classify if the clause specifies a notice period required to terminate renewal. contract clause 228 7
cuad_post-termination_services LegalBench Classify if the clause subjects a party to obligations after the termination or expiration of a contract, including any post-termination transition, payment, transfer of IP, wind-down, last-buy, or similar commitments. contract clause 814 7
cuad_price_restrictions LegalBench Classify if the clause places a restriction on the ability of a party to raise or reduce prices of technology, goods, or services provided. contract clause 52 7
cuad_renewal_term LegalBench The model must determine if a contractual clause specifies a renewal term. contract clause 392 7
cuad_revenue-profit_sharing LegalBench Classify if the clause requires a party to share revenue or profit with the counterparty for any technology, goods, or services. contract clause 780 7
cuad_rofr-rofo-rofn LegalBench Classify if the clause grants one party a right of first refusal, right of first offer, or right of first negotiation to purchase, license, market, or distribute equity interest, technology, assets, products, or services. contract clause 696 7
cuad_source_code_escrow LegalBench Classify if the clause requires one party to deposit its source code into escrow with a third party, which can be released to the counterparty upon the occurrence of certain events. contract clause 124 7
cuad_termination_for_convenience LegalBench Classify if the clause specifies that one party can terminate this contract without cause (solely by giving a notice and allowing a waiting period to expire). contract clause 436 7
cuad_third_party_beneficiary LegalBench Classify if the clause specifies that there is a non-contracting party who is a beneficiary to some or all of the clauses in the contract and therefore can enforce its rights against a contracting party. contract clause 74 7
cuad_uncapped_liability LegalBench Classify if the clause specifies that a party’s liability is uncapped upon the breach of its obligation in the contract. contract clause 300 7
cuad_unlimited-all-you-can-eat-license LegalBench Classify if the clause grants one party an 'enterprise,' 'all you can eat' or unlimited usage license. contract clause 54 7
cuad_volume_restriction LegalBench Classify if the clause specifies a fee increase or consent requirement, etc. if one party’s use of the product/services exceeds certain threshold. contract clause 328 7
cuad_warranty_duration LegalBench Classify if the clause specifies a duration of any warranty against defects or errors in technology, products, or services provided under the contract. contract clause 326 7
definition_classification LegalBench Given a sentence from a Supreme Court opinion, classify whether or not that sentence offers a definition of a term. judicial text 1345 7
definition_extraction LegalBench Extract the term being defined in sentences from Supreme Court opinions. judicial text 695 7
diversity_1 LegalBench Determine if the criteria for diversity jurisdiction have been met based on the citizenships of plaintiffs and defendants and the amounts associated with claims. fact pattern 306 19
diversity_2 LegalBench Determine if the criteria for diversity jurisdiction have been met based on the citizenships of plaintiffs and defendants and the amounts associated with claims. fact pattern 306 19
diversity_3 LegalBench Determine if the criteria for diversity jurisdiction have been met based on the citizenships of plaintiffs and defendants and the amounts associated with claims. fact pattern 306 19
diversity_4 LegalBench Determine if the criteria for diversity jurisdiction have been met based on the citizenships of plaintiffs and defendants and the amounts associated with claims. fact pattern 306 19
diversity_5 LegalBench Determine if the criteria for diversity jurisdiction have been met based on the citizenships of plaintiffs and defendants and the amounts associated with claims. fact pattern 306 19
diversity_6 LegalBench Determine if the criteria for diversity jurisdiction have been met based on the citizenships of plaintiffs and defendants and the amounts associated with claims. fact pattern 306 19
function_of_decision_section LegalBench Classify the function of different sections of legal written opinions. judicial text 374 7
hearsay LegalBench Classify if a particular piece of evidence qualifies as hearsay. fact pattern 99 19
housing_qa_knowledge_only HousingQA Answer questions about eviction law according to state law in 2021, using only knowledge encoded in model weights. legal question 6853 4
housing_qa_statute_comprehension HousingQA Answer questions about eviction law according to state law in 2021, given the relevant statute text. legal question 6853 9
insurance_policy_interpretation LegalBench Given an insurance claim and policy, determine whether the claim is covered by the policy. legal text 138 7
international_citizenship_questions LegalBench Answer questions about citizenship law from across the world. legal question 9310 7
jcrew_blocker LegalBench Classify if a clause in a loan agreement is a J.Crew blocker provision. legal text 60 7
learned_hands_benefits LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to benefits. legal question 72 7
learned_hands_business LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to business. legal question 180 7
learned_hands_consumer LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to consumer. legal question 620 7
learned_hands_courts LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to courts. legal question 198 7
learned_hands_crime LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to crime. legal question 694 7
learned_hands_divorce LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to divorce. legal question 156 7
learned_hands_domestic_violence LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to domestic violence. legal question 180 7
learned_hands_education LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to education. legal question 62 7
learned_hands_employment LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to employment. legal question 716 7
learned_hands_estates LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to estates. legal question 184 7
learned_hands_family LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to family. legal question 2271 7
learned_hands_health LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to health. legal question 232 7
learned_hands_housing LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to housing. legal question 4500 7
learned_hands_immigration LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to immigration. legal question 140 7
learned_hands_torts LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to torts. legal question 438 7
learned_hands_traffic LegalBench Classify if a user post implicates legal issues related to traffic. legal question 562 7
legal_reasoning_causality LegalBench Classify whether a district court opinion excerpt relies on statistical evidence in its reasoning for finding causality. judicial text 59 7
maud_ability_to_consummate_concept_is_subject_to_mae_carveouts LegalBench Determine whether the 'ability to consummate' concept in a merger agreement is subject to Material Adverse Effect (MAE) carveouts. merger agreement 70 7
maud_accuracy_of_fundamental_target_rws_bringdown_standard LegalBench This is a multiple-choice task in which the model must select the answer that best characterizes the accuracy required for fundamental representations and warranties in a merger agreement according to the bring down provision. merger agreement 176 7
maud_accuracy_of_target_"general"_r&w:_bringdown_timing_answer LegalBench The LLM must read an excerpt from a merger agreement and select the correct timing for when representations and warranties are required according to the bring down provision. merger agreement 182 7
maud_accuracy_of_target_capitalization_rw_(outstanding_shares)_bringdown_standard_answer LegalBench This is a multiple-choice task in which the model must select the answer that best characterizes the accuracy required for capitalization representations and warranties in a merger agreement according to the bring down provision. merger agreement 182 7
maud_additional_matching_rights_period_for_modifications_(cor) LegalBench This is a multiple-choice task in which the model must select the answer that best characterizes the merger agreement regarding the duration of the additional matching rights period for modifications if the board changes its recommendation. merger agreement 159 7
maud_application_of_buyer_consent_requirement_(negative_interim_covenant) LegalBench The model must select the answer that best characterizes the negative covenants to which the requirement of Buyer consent applies in a merger agreement. merger agreement 181 7
maud_buyer_consent_requirement_(ordinary_course) LegalBench The model must determine if there are any limitations on the Buyer’s right to condition, withhold, or delay their consent regarding the acquired company’s ordinary business operations based on an excerpt from a merger agreement. merger agreement 182 7
maud_change_in_law__subject_to_disproportionate_impact_modifier LegalBench The model must determine whether changes in law that have a disproportionate impact qualify for Material Adverse Effect (MAE) based on an excerpt from a merger agreement. merger agreement 100 7
maud_changes_in_gaap_or_other_accounting_principles__subject_to_disproportionate_impact_modifier LegalBench The model must determine whether changes in GAAP or other accounting principles that have a disproportionate impact qualify for Material Adverse Effect (MAE) based on an excerpt from a merger agreement. merger agreement 99 7
maud_cor_permitted_in_response_to_intervening_event LegalBench The model must determine whether a Change of Recommendation is permitted in response to an intervening event based on an excerpt from a merger agreement. merger agreement 101 7
maud_cor_permitted_with_board_fiduciary_determination_only LegalBench The model must determine whether a Change of Recommendation is permitted in a merger agreement if the board concludes that such a change is necessary to meet its fiduciary duties. merger agreement 101 7
maud_cor_standard_(intervening_event) LegalBench The model must select the answer that best characterizes the standard the board should follow when determining whether to change its recommendation in response to an intervening event in a merger agreement. merger agreement 85 7
maud_cor_standard_(superior_offer) LegalBench This is a multiple-choice task in which the model must select the answer that best characterizes the merger agreement regarding the standard the board should follow when determining whether to change its recommendation in connection with a superior offer. merger agreement 101 7
maud_definition_contains_knowledge_requirement_-_answer LegalBench The model must select the answer that best characterizes the knowledge requirement in the definition of 'Intervening Event' from a segment of a merger agreement. merger agreement 148 7
maud_definition_includes_asset_deals LegalBench The model must select the answer that best characterizes what qualifies as a superior offer in terms of asset deals from a merger agreement excerpt. merger agreement 147 7
maud_definition_includes_stock_deals LegalBench The model must select the answer that best characterizes what qualifies as a superior offer in terms of stock deals within a merger agreement. merger agreement 149 7
maud_fiduciary_exception:_board_determination_trigger_(no_shop) LegalBench This is a multiple-choice task in which the model must select the answer that best characterizes the merger agreement regarding the type of offer the Board could act on despite the no-shop provision. merger agreement 180 7
maud_fiduciary_exception__board_determination_standard LegalBench The model must select the answer that best characterizes the circumstances under which the Board could take actions on a different acquisition proposal notwithstanding the no-shop provision in a merger agreement. merger agreement 180 7
maud_financial_point_of_view_is_the_sole_consideration LegalBench The model must determine if 'financial point of view' is the sole consideration in assessing the superiority of an offer in a merger agreement. merger agreement 113 7
maud_fls_(mae)_standard LegalBench The model must select the answer that best characterizes the Forward Looking Standard (FLS) with respect to Material Adverse Effect (MAE) from an excerpt of a merger agreement. merger agreement 78 7
maud_general_economic_and_financial_conditions_subject_to_disproportionate_impact_modifier LegalBench The model must determine whether changes caused by general economic and financial conditions that have a disproportionate impact qualify for Material Adverse Effect (MAE) based on an excerpt from a merger agreement. merger agreement 99 7
maud_includes_consistent_with_past_practice LegalBench The model must determine if the Efforts Covenant clause in a merger agreement includes the phrase 'consistent with past practice'. merger agreement 182 7
maud_initial_matching_rights_period_(cor) LegalBench This is a multiple-choice task in which the model must select the answer that best characterizes the merger agreement regarding the duration of the initial matching rights period if the board changes its recommendation. merger agreement 159 7
maud_initial_matching_rights_period_(ftr) LegalBench The model must select the answer that best characterizes the duration of the initial matching rights period in connection with the Fiduciary Termination Right (FTR) from a merger agreement excerpt. merger agreement 133 7
maud_intervening_event_-_required_to_occur_after_signing_-_answer LegalBench This task requires the model to determine whether an 'Intervening Event' is mandated to occur after the signing of a merger agreement. merger agreement 148 7
maud_knowledge_definition LegalBench The model must select the answer that best characterizes the concept of Knowledge in a merger agreement. merger agreement 168 7
maud_liability_standard_for_no-shop_breach_by_target_non-d&o_representatives LegalBench The model must select the answer that best characterizes the liability standard for no-shop breach by Target Non-D&O Representatives in a merger agreement. merger agreement 157 7
maud_ordinary_course_efforts_standard LegalBench The model must select the answer that best characterizes the efforts standard in a merger agreement excerpt. merger agreement 182 7
maud_pandemic_or_other_public_health_event__subject_to_"disproportionate_impact"_modifier LegalBench The model must determine whether pandemics or other public health events need to have a disproportionate impact to qualify for Material Adverse Effect (MAE) based on an excerpt from a merger agreement. merger agreement 99 7
maud_pandemic_or_other_public_health_event_specific_reference_to_pandemic-related_governmental_responses_or_measures LegalBench The model must determine if there is a specific reference to pandemic-related governmental responses or measures in a merger agreement clause that qualifies pandemics or other public health events for Material Adverse Effect (MAE). merger agreement 99 7
maud_relational_language_(mae)_applies_to LegalBench The model must select the answer that best characterizes the carveouts pertaining to Material Adverse Effect (MAE) in a merger agreement excerpt. merger agreement 91 7
maud_specific_performance LegalBench This task requires the model to read an excerpt from a merger agreement and select the correct wording of the Specific Performance clause regarding the parties’ entitlement in the event of a contractual breach. merger agreement 179 7
maud_tail_period_length LegalBench The model must read an excerpt from a merger agreement and determine the duration of the Tail Period by selecting the best answer from multiple-choice options. merger agreement 180 7
maud_type_of_consideration LegalBench The model must select the answer that best characterizes the type of consideration specified in a merger agreement. merger agreement 173 7
nys_judicial_ethics LegalBench Answer questions on judicial ethics from the New York State Unified Court System Advisory Committee. legal question 300 7
opp115_data_retention LegalBench Classify whether a clause from a privacy policy describes how long user information is stored. privacy policy 96 7
opp115_data_security LegalBench Classify whether a clause from a privacy policy describes how user information is protected. privacy policy 1342 7
opp115_do_not_track LegalBench Classify if a clause from a privacy policy describes if and how Do Not Track signals for online tracking and advertising are honored. privacy policy 118 7
opp115_first_party_collection_use LegalBench Classify whether a clause from a privacy policy describes how and why a service provider collects user information. privacy policy 2094 7
opp115_international_and_specific_audiences LegalBench Classify whether a clause from a privacy policy describes practices that pertain only to a specific group of users. privacy policy 988 7
opp115_policy_change LegalBench Classify if a clause from a privacy policy describes if and how users will be informed about changes to the privacy policy. privacy policy 439 7
opp115_third_party_sharing_collection LegalBench Classify whether a clause from a privacy policy describes how user information may be shared with or collected by third parties. privacy policy 1598 7
opp115_user_access,_edit_and_deletion LegalBench Classify if a clause from a privacy policy describes if and how users may access, edit, or delete their information. privacy policy 470 6
opp115_user_choice_control LegalBench Classify if a clause from a privacy policy describes the choices and control options available to users. privacy policy 1554 7
oral_argument_question_purpose LegalBench Given a question asked during oral argument, classify the purpose of the question. oral argument 319 7
overruling LegalBench Classify whether a sentence from a judicial opinion overrules a previous case. judicial text 2400 7
personal_jurisdiction LegalBench Determine if a court in a given forum can exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant based on their contacts with that forum. fact pattern 54 19
privacy_policy_entailment LegalBench Determine if the description of a privacy policy clause is correct. privacy policy 4343 7
privacy_policy_qa LegalBench Determine if a clause from a privacy policy contains enough information to answer a given question. privacy policy 10931 7
proa LegalBench Given a statute, determine if the text contains an explicit private right of action. statute 100 7
sara_entailment LegalBench Given a statute, a fact pattern, and an assertion, determine if the assertion is 'entailed' by the fact pattern and statute. fact pattern 276 7
scalr LegalBench Given a legal question, identify the holding statement (amongst a set of candidates) that best answers a particular legal question. legal question 571 7
ssla_company_defendants LegalBench This task requires the LLM to extract the identities of company defendants from excerpts of securities class action complaints. complaint 1231 7
ssla_individual_defendants LegalBench This task requires the LLM to extract the identities of individual defendants from excerpts of securities class action complaints. complaint 1015 7
ssla_plaintiff LegalBench Extract the identities of the plaintiffs from excerpts of securities class action complaints. complaint 1036 7
statutory_reasoning_assessment LegalBench Given a statute and a set of facts, determine how much tax an individual owes. statute 100 7
successor_liability LegalBench Given a fact pattern, identify the type of successor liability present. fact pattern 50 19
supply_chain_disclosure_best_practice_accountability LegalBench Determine if a supply chain disclosure indicates whether the retail seller or manufacturer maintains internal compliance procedures regarding human trafficking and slavery. corporate disclosure 387 7
supply_chain_disclosure_best_practice_audits LegalBench Given a supply chain disclosure, determine if the statement discloses whether the retail seller or manufacturer performs any type of audit, or reserves the right to audit. corporate disclosure 387 7
supply_chain_disclosure_best_practice_certification LegalBench Determine if a supply chain disclosure indicates whether the retail seller or manufacturer requires direct suppliers to certify compliance with labor and anti-trafficking laws. corporate disclosure 386 7
supply_chain_disclosure_best_practice_training LegalBench Determine if a supply chain disclosure indicates whether the retail seller or manufacturer provides training to employees on human trafficking and slavery. corporate disclosure 387 7
supply_chain_disclosure_best_practice_verification LegalBench Determine if a supply chain disclosure indicates engagement in verification and auditing practices or assessment of supplier risks. corporate disclosure 387 7
supply_chain_disclosure_disclosed_accountability LegalBench Determine whether a supply chain disclosure reveals the extent of internal accountability standards and procedures related to slavery and trafficking for employees or contractors. corporate disclosure 386 7
supply_chain_disclosure_disclosed_audits LegalBench Given a disclosure, determine whether the statement discloses to what extent, if any, that the retail seller or manufacturer conducts audits of suppliers to evaluate supplier compliance with company standards for trafficking and slavery in supply chains. corporate disclosure 387 7
supply_chain_disclosure_disclosed_certification LegalBench Determine if a supply chain disclosure indicates the extent to which a retail seller or manufacturer requires direct suppliers to certify compliance with laws regarding slavery and human trafficking. corporate disclosure 386 7
supply_chain_disclosure_disclosed_training LegalBench Determine if a supply chain disclosure indicates whether training on human trafficking and slavery is provided to employees and management responsible for supply chain management. corporate disclosure 387 7
supply_chain_disclosure_disclosed_verification LegalBench Determine if a supply chain disclosure indicates whether the retail seller or manufacturer verifies product supply chains to address risks of human trafficking and slavery. corporate disclosure 387 7
telemarketing_sales_rule LegalBench Determine how 16 C.F.R. § 310.3(a)(1) and 16 C.F.R. § 310.3(a)(2) apply to different fact patterns. fact pattern 51 7
textualism_tool_dictionaries LegalBench Determine if a paragraph from a judicial opinion is applying a form of textualism that relies on the dictionary meaning of terms. judicial text 111 7
textualism_tool_plain LegalBench Determine if a paragraph from a judicial opinion is applying a form of textualism that relies on the ordinary ('plain') meaning of terms. judicial text 169 7
ucc_v_common_law LegalBench Determine whether a contract is governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) or the common law of contracts. fact pattern 100 19
unfair_tos LegalBench Given a clause from a terms-of-service contract, determine the category the clause belongs to. contract clause 3822 7